Geeks2U Promise
We guarantee you'll love our fast, friendly service - or we'll refund your money.  
133,572 Happy Customers & Counting
Need tech support?
1300 769 448
Extended hours, 7 days a week
Home  /  geekspeak  /  iPad Pro: Maybe great, but not green

iPad Pro: Maybe great, but not green

ipadpro97

Kermit the Frog famously sang that it wasn’t easy being green. It’s a well known song, and one that, many years ago, Apple even used in one of its advertising campaigns for the original models of iMac computer — predictably, the green one.

Apple this week unveiled one of the worst kept secrets in smartphones with the iPhone SE. It’s a smaller form factor iPhone 6s in most important respects with a 4 inch display, no 3D touch capability and a slightly cut down front camera — but in all other respects it may as well be the iPhone 6s. It is, however, slightly cheaper than the 6s, which might have some appeal, but primarily if you’re going to go on contract for it. With an asking price starting at $679 for the 16GB model or $829 for the 64GB model, it’s not exactly a cheap smartphone. Apple gear never is.

Apple also introduced a 9.7 inch variant of what it’s now dubbing the iPad Pro, although that nomenclature’s essentially being applied to anything running on the A9X processor, and with the iPad Air 2 being on the older side right now, it was inevitable that Apple’s most popular tablet size would get some kind of parity with the 12.9 inch model. I’d be very surprised if there was an iPad Air 3 to speak of in the future; Apple’s pretty clearly putting its eggs in the iPad Pro basket. That’s got some interesting future implications if you’re a Mac user rather than an iOS user, because Apple makes far more money from its iOS devices than it does its Mac platform. At some point in the not-so-distant future it’s not inconceivable that Apple could opt to quietly discontinue Macs in favour of iPads and iPhones — the iPad Pro branding could just be the beginning.

One other thing Apple did at the launch of the iPad Pro 9.7 inch and iPhone SE was talk up its green credentials. It showed off a recycling robot and its own solar power initiatives well before it announced any new products. Predictably as part of the launch, Apple took a small swipe at its Windows competition, complaining that there were over 500 million Windows PCs worldwide that were more than five years old and still in operation. Apple’s take was that it was “sad” because they’d be better off with an iPad Pro. I’m certain that Apple would love to sell 500 million iPad Pros.

They’re probably not wrong with the figures, given that despite Apple’s overall market success, Windows is still the dominant platform and has been for decades now. What surprised me, however, was how Apple’s trying to use the age of Windows PCs to sell iPad Pros. Not so much from a straight productivity point of view — I get that a five year old PC probably is a little clunky compared to a highly optimised 2016 tablet — but simply because upgrading a system that works, even if it works slow, isn’t actually terribly “green”.

The issues around the overall environmental suitability of a lot of IT equipment are quite complex, because the creation of a lot of technology involves complex and sometimes toxic chemical processes that have to be carefully managed. That’s why when your IT gear does stop working, getting it responsibly recycled is an absolute must.

However that’s a step that should only be taken once it’s at its actual end of life cycle. Yes, computer parts can be recycled into other forms, and even other IT products eventually, but all of that takes power, water, shipping and an overall environmental cost.

Whereas a computer that’s still working has already paid its environmental “price” back when it was built. By all means, consumers should upgrade when it makes sense to do so, especially if a given PC, Mac or tablet dies or is no longer of use.

But the greenest thing you can do with any bit of computing gear is to keep on using it, rather than replacing it just because a computer company suggested that you should.

FacebookTwitterGoogle+Share

Recent News

blueborne

Security used to be one of those factors that was hard-wired into any financial software product or generally security focused-application, but in recent years we’ve seen a massive growth in the number of exploits that attack other software vectors in order to gain control of, or access to a system. The latest potentially troublesome vulnerability… More 

fall

One of the key platforms for Microsoft’s Windows 10 operating system was that it was going to be a continuously iterated platform with major releases happening to a regular schedule. Unlike the service packs of old, these wouldn’t just be bug fixes and security patches, but the introduction of new features and services, meaning that… More 

ransomware

In the early days of computer security, viruses were largely destructive while often relaying self-aggrandising messages about their authors, or straight up offensive statements about precisely how stuffed your system now was, thanks to corruption of storage media, system BIOSes or other critical computer components. They were the brainchild of often bored and seriously immature… More 

note8

Samsung recently announced its latest premium smartphone, the Galaxy Note 8 at a flashy event in New York City, followed up very rapidly by opening up pre-orders for the device in Australia less than 24 hours later. That’s the fastest I think I’ve ever seen a newly announced device go to a sales channel, although… More