Geeks2U Promise
We guarantee you'll love our fast, friendly service - or we'll refund your money.  
133,572 Happy Customers & Counting
Need tech support?
1300 769 448
Extended hours, 7 days a week
Home  /  geekspeak  /  Netflix offline won’t solve your travel watching woes

Netflix offline won’t solve your travel watching woes

netflixdl

Australians generally have taken to online streaming services with extreme gusto, despite the generally woeful state of our broadband services in world terms. The Australian Communications and Media Authority recently released its 2015-2016 Communications Report, detailing the communications activities of Australians across all kinds of services. For broadband, and specifically online video content, it’s a key driver of our online activities, with 91% of Australians having accessed the online world in the six months to May 2016, and of those folks 68% were accessing online video services several times a day.

Some services definitely split along age lines, with catchup services such as the ABC’s excellent iView attracting an older audience where younger viewers favoured services such as YouTube. Subscription services such as Netflix were popular with 32% of the online streaming audience.

Online streaming can be great value as long as two primary conditions are met. First of all, they’ve got to have something you actually want to watch to justify themselves. That’s an ever-evolving buffet of choices, because individual shows come and go from any of the streaming services, and many (including Netflix) are now investing serious money in their own original content that you won’t normally find elsewhere at all.

The second condition is of course that you have a broadband connection where you want to watch of sufficient quality to actually stream. Here Netflix often outclasses its competition, both in the high end, where it offers some content in 4K quality if you’ve got a fat enough broadband pipe, but also on the lower end, where its standard definition adaptive streaming can often deliver at least partially watchable content even on a lousy connection. It can’t work miracles, but it does what it can.

That always-online portion is problem though if you travel, because when you’re remote, or if you’re outside mobile broadband areas, or simply don’t want to cough up the mobile (or inflight) broadband fees, many of which are expensive, there’s not much value in the service per se. Netflix recently announced that it’s making content on its service available for download, which, you might think, would alleviate that connectivity problem. Load up some movies and TV shows, and even if you are on, say, a flight to Europe or the US, you’re sorted for your own curated list of watchable programming.

Except that there are some significant limitations with Netflix’s approach to this. It’s available for Android and iOS tablets and mobiles only, so if you travel or watch through a laptop, you’re out of luck straight away. Not everything is available, as the SMH points out, and while you might think that this was simply a rights issue between Netflix and the TV and movie studios it licences from, this even includes so-called “Netflix Originals” content only found on Netflix itself. You’d think if anywhere they’d hold those rights. It’s not clear how long you’d have to watch specific shows or films, and it’s strictly one-at-a-time downloading, so if you want to use a long trip to catch up on a season of a show, you’ll have to download every episode individually, if you’re even allowed to.

I’ve long travelled with a selection of legal entertainment options on a tablet, because while alternatives such as inflight entertainment have improved in leaps and bounds over the years, they can still crash, or for that matter be filled with trash I’ve no interest in actually watching. That’s a more tedious process in some ways, but it relies on content I explicitly own licences for, whether they came direct from iTunes or Google Play, or bundled with a physical disc. Netflix’s efforts to offer offline playback aren’t a bad thing per se, but their initial implementation is quite messy, and not the seamless experience you might otherwise expect.

FacebookTwitterGoogle+Share

Recent News

8thgen

For decades now, if you were buying a PC, you essentially had two choices when it came to the processor that ran it. For the most part, Intel’s processors under various branding such as Pentium or Core were what you were most likely to hit, with rival AMD’s CPUs generally found in lower-cost machines, or… More 

spectremeltdown

Usually when you hear about large scale security problems, it’s because there’s been an obscure exploit of some incredibly complicated code that somebody’s worked out a way around, leading to the need for software patches, or an entirely human error where access was pilfered via purely social means. Hardware flaws that affect computer security aren’t… More 

password

2017 was a year of some very large security breaches across all sorts of companies, from smaller online merchants all the way up to bigger brands, such as the uber-leak that came out of, well, Uber, where a data leak saw the records of some 57 million users worldwide compromised. As such, you would think… More 

world

The ambition behind Google’s Street View was (originally) to provide a little more human context to people’s map searches. It’s all very good to say that a journey will take so many minutes, or that you need to make this sequence of turns in order to get to your destination, but it’s long been a… More